You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-10

S. Jong vs A. Juan Mano — prediction

M25 The Hague
✗ Missed
JONGWIN PROBABILITYMANO
58%
Elo prob.
@1.43
odds · 70% impl.
H2H 1–0 Jong🎾Serve 65%📈Form 7/10 · 2✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1643 vs 1588 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 73 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.73
fair odds
−17.1%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo)▸ Jong●●
Jong rates 55 Elo points above Juan Mano (1643 vs 1588), a real but modest gap in an ITF field.
Form▸ Jong●●
Jong's last 10 (7W-3L) beats Juan Mano's (4W-6L), though both are on a 2-match win streak right now.
Head-to-head▸ Jong
Their only meeting went to Jong in 2026, but a single match is too small a sample to lean on heavily.
Serve/return▸ Jong●●
Jong wins 65% of serve points and 36% of return points, a solid all-around profile; no comparable numbers exist for the opponent.
Rest▸ Mano
Both played 1 day ago, but Jong has logged 3 matches in 14 days versus 2 for Juan Mano, a slightly heavier recent load.
Value/EV= Even●●●
Market implies 70% for Jong while the model gives 58%, producing a -17.1% EV — the price outruns the model's estimate.
LEVEL AND FORM

Jong enters as the rated favorite by Elo, 1643 to 1588, a 55-point edge that in ITF-level tennis translates to a moderate but not overwhelming advantage. That gap is reinforced by recent form: Jong's 7-3 record over his last 10 matches is clearly better than Juan Mano's 4-6 stretch, even though both players currently sit on a 2-match winning streak heading into this contest.

Together, these two factors point the same direction — toward Jong having the higher floor coming into this match — but neither is large enough to be decisive on its own in a tier where week-to-week variance is high.

SERVICE GAME

Jong's numbers show a serve that wins 65% of points and a return game that takes 36%, a combination that suggests a player comfortable both holding and creating pressure on the opponent's serve. Without any equivalent serve or return percentage for Juan Mano, it isn't possible to quantify a direct style mismatch — this data only tells us Jong's own game is functioning well, not how it maps against this specific opponent's patterns.

HISTORY AND WORKLOAD

The two have met once, with Jong winning in 2026, but a single head-to-head result carries little statistical weight and shouldn't be treated as a strong signal here. On the schedule side, both players are working on one day of rest, though Jong has played one extra match in the last two weeks (3 vs 2) — a minor difference that could matter marginally in physical freshness but isn't a major factor by itself.

VALUE READ

The model gives Jong a 58% chance to win, but the market is pricing him at an implied 70% probability (odds of 1.43). That gap produces a -17.1% expected value on the favorite at this price — the market is more confident in Jong than the model's inputs justify.

It's worth stressing that this projection comes from a soft Elo-based method for Challenger/ITF matches, where any edge is unproven and the market itself is thinner and less efficient than at tour level. Being the favorite here does not equal value: at these odds, the numbers argue against backing Jong, and there's no data-supported case for the opponent either. This is a pass, not a play.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →