You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-10

F. Balshaw vs F. Broska — prediction

Liege (Belgium) - Qualification
✗ Missed
BALSHAWWIN PROBABILITYBROSKA
67%
Elo prob.
@1.30
odds · 77% impl.
🎾Serve 64%📈Form 8/10 · 2✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1814 vs 1692 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 106 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.50
fair odds
−13.2%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Balshaw●●●
122-point Elo gap (1814 vs 1692) is significant at Challenger level and is the model's main basis for favoring Balshaw.
Serve/return▸ Balshaw●●
Both hold serve at 64%, but Balshaw returns better (44% vs 42%), giving him the tiebreaking edge in tight rallies.
Rest▸ Balshaw
Both played yesterday, but Broska logged 6 matches in 14 days vs Balshaw's 4 — more accumulated fatigue for the opponent.
Form▸ Balshaw
Balshaw is 8-2 in his last 10 vs Broska's 7-3; a marginal but consistent edge in recent results.
Value/EV= Even●●●
Market prices Balshaw at 77% implied probability vs the model's 67% — a -13.2% expected value, meaning no edge at these odds.
ELO GAP

Balshaw's 1814 Elo sits 122 points above Broska's 1692, a gap that at Challenger level typically translates into a clear favorite status. This is a soft-market Elo estimate rather than the full ATP factor model, so it should be read as directional rather than precise — but the size of the gap (122 points) is still the strongest single signal in this match.

SERVE VS RETURN BALANCE

Both players hold serve at an identical 64%, so this match likely comes down to return games. Balshaw's 44% return rate edges out Broska's 42% — a 2-point gap that isn't dramatic, but in evenly-served Challenger matches, the player who breaks slightly more often is often the one who closes out sets.

WORKLOAD AND MOMENTUM

Neither player is fully rested (both played one day ago), but Broska has carried a heavier workload — 6 matches in the last 14 days versus Balshaw's 4. That extra match volume can compound over a best-of-three or best-of-five format, particularly in the FI legs where physical output matters most.

Form modestly reinforces this: Balshaw is 8-2 over his last 10 matches compared to Broska's 7-3. Neither streak is dominant, but combined with the workload gap, the recent trend leans toward Balshaw entering this match fresher and slightly sharper.

VALUE READ

The model gives Balshaw a 67% win probability, but the market (via the 1.30 odds) implies 77% — a meaningful gap. That mismatch produces a -13.2% expected value, meaning that even though Balshaw is the more likely winner on paper, backing him at this price is not a good bet by the model's own math.

This is worth stating plainly: favorite does not mean value. The market is pricing in more certainty than the Elo-based model supports, and since this is a soft Challenger/ITF market with unproven edge, there's no statistical case for backing Balshaw here despite his higher win probability.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →