You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-10

A. Gray vs C. Chidekh — prediction

Nottingham 4
✗ Missed
GRAYWIN PROBABILITYCHIDEKH
58%
Elo prob.
@1.86
odds · 54% impl.
H2H 1–0 Gray🎾Serve 66%📈Form 6/10 · 2✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1799 vs 1746 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 279 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.74
fair odds
+7.1%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo)▸ Gray●●
Gray rates higher, 1799 vs 1746, a 53-point Elo gap consistent with his 58% model probability.
Serve/return▸ Gray●●●
Gray leads on both ends, 66% serve vs 64% and 40% return vs 39%, a small but real edge in every exchange.
Form▸ Gray●●
Gray's last 10 show 6 wins to 4 losses; Chidekh sits at 4-6 over the same span, favoring the favorite's momentum.
Head-to-head▸ Gray
Their only prior meeting went to Gray in 2024, though a single match is too small to weigh heavily.
Rest= Even
Both players are on 2 days' rest with 2 matches in the last 14 days — no scheduling advantage either way.
Market value= Even●●
Model gives Gray 58% vs a 54% market-implied price at 1.86 odds, a 7.1% EV edge from a soft, less-liquid Challenger market.
ELO AND STYLE

Gray's Elo advantage (1799 vs 1746) lines up with a real technical edge: he outperforms Chidekh on both serve (66% vs 64%) and return (40% vs 39%). That double edge matters more than a single-category gap would — Gray isn't just stronger in one phase, he's slightly ahead in both the points he serves and the points he returns, which compounds over a best-of-three format.

Neither serve number is dominant enough to suggest a big-hitting mismatch; this reads as a moderate, all-around quality gap rather than a specific stylistic clash.

FORM AND MOMENTUM

Gray arrives with a 6-4 record over his last 10 matches, while Chidekh sits at 4-6 in the same window. Both are currently on 2-match winning streaks, so the short-term trajectory has turned positive for each, but Gray's longer sample is simply better balanced.

The single head-to-head meeting (Gray won in 2024) adds a small psychological data point in his favor, though with only one prior match, it shouldn't be weighted heavily.

RECOVERY CONDITIONS

Both players are working with identical rest profiles: 2 days since their last match and 2 matches played in the last 14 days. This removes fatigue or scheduling asymmetry as a factor — neither side enters with a physical edge from recovery time.

VALUE READ

The model prices Gray at 58% against a market-implied 54% (odds of 1.86), producing a 7.1% expected-value edge. That gap is worth noting but should be treated cautiously: this is an Elo-based estimate in a Challenger/ITF market, which is thinner and less efficiently priced than tour-level markets, so the edge is unproven in practice.

Being the favorite here is consistent with the numbers — better Elo, better serve/return figures, better recent form — but none of these margins are large. This looks like a legitimate lean toward Gray rather than a mispriced opportunity; treat the EV as a soft signal, not a guarantee.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →