ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-09

A. Deckers vs A. Timiniprediction

M15 Hillcrest 2
DECKERSWIN PROBABILITYTIMINI
71%
Elo prob.
@1.21
odds · 83% impl.
Rest 1d vs 2d📈Form 5/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1608 vs 1454 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 174 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.41
fair odds
−14.3%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Deckers●●●
Deckers' 1608 Elo is 154 points above Timini's 1454, the core driver of his 71% model win probability.
Form▸ Deckers
Deckers is 5-5 in his last 10 vs Timini's 4-6, a marginal recent-form edge with both on a 1-match win streak.
Rest▸ Timini●●
Deckers has played 4 matches in 14 days on just 1 day rest, more accumulated fatigue than Timini's 2 matches on 2 days rest.
Market value= Even●●●
Odds of 1.21 imply an 83% chance, well above the model's 71% — a -14.3% EV shows no value on the favorite.
ELO GAP

The 154-point Elo gap (1608 vs 1454) is the clearest signal in this match, translating directly into Deckers' 71% projected win probability. At this ITF Challenger tier, though, Elo is estimated from a thinner, less consistently tracked match history than tour-level data, so the gap should be read as a reasonable baseline rather than a precise measurement of the class difference between these two.

With no surface, serve, or head-to-head data available, this rating differential effectively is the model's case for Deckers. It is a real edge in relative playing level, but it comes without the corroborating detail (return numbers, surface splits) that would normally sharpen the picture.

FORM AND WORKLOAD

Recent form offers only a slight tilt toward Deckers, who is 5-5 over his last 10 matches compared to Timini's 4-6. Both players are riding a single-match win streak, so neither arrives with real momentum — this is a marginal factor rather than a decisive one.

Workload cuts the other way. Deckers has played 4 matches in the last 14 days and is working on just 1 day of rest, while Timini has played only 2 matches in the same span with 2 days off. Over best-of-three ITF matches this is a moderate consideration, but repeated short turnarounds can blunt physicality in longer rallies or deciding sets, and it is the one tangible factor pulling against the favorite.

VALUE CHECK

The market prices Deckers considerably higher than the model does: 83% implied by the 1.21 odds against a 71% model estimate, producing a -14.3% expected value. That is a meaningful gap, and it means backing the favorite here is not supported by this analysis, regardless of Deckers' Elo advantage.

It's worth stressing that Elo-based projections in the Challenger/ITF space are estimates in a soft, thinly-traded market — useful as a directional read, but not a proven edge. Being the model's favorite is not the same as being undervalued, and on the numbers here, Deckers is the likely winner but not a value play at these odds.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →