PREDICCIÓN DEL MODELO · 2026-08-19
HARD

M. Andreeva vs M. Kostyukpredicción

✗ Fallado
ANDREEVAPROBABILIDAD DE VICTORIAKOSTYUK
55%
prob. modelo
@1.71
cuota · 58% impl.
H2H 1–2 AndreevaHard 71%🎾Saque 61%📈Forma 6/10 · 2✓
CONDICIONES DEL PARTIDOen el modelocontexto
Superficie
Dura

Bote regular y velocidad media-alta: condiciones neutras, sin favorecer un estilo.

Temperatura
28°C

Ambiente cálido: la bola vuela algo más y el físico cuenta.

Humedad
55%

Aire húmedo: la bola pierde algo de velocidad.

Viento
8 km/h

Viento flojo: sin efecto apreciable.

La superficie sí entra en el modelo (la especialización por superficie es uno de sus factores). El clima y la altitud son contexto que publicamos para ti — NO mueven la probabilidad.

EL RAZONAMIENTO DEL MODELO

Ranking: #6 vs #11 (mejor clasificado)

Forma reciente: 7/10 en los últimos partidos

Cara a cara: 1-2 en contra

Sólido en pista dura: 67% en su carrera en esta superficie

OJO CON

!Cara a cara desfavorable (1-2)

Probabilidad calibrada del modelo (~64% de precisión fuera de muestra, validada específicamente en WTA). No es una garantía: el modelo ≈ el mercado de media, así que la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.
@1.81
cuota justa
−5.6%
valor esperado
CÓMO IMPORTA CADA FACTOR
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Kostyuk●●
Kostyuk ranks #11 vs Andreeva #6, but Elo favors Kostyuk (1960 vs 1924). Model gives Andreeva 55%, slight edge aligned with ranking; Elo suggests parity or slight underdog lean.
Head-to-head▸ Kostyuk●●
Kostyuk leads 2–1 in recent meetings (2026). Andreeva won once recently, but pattern shows Kostyuk's edge in this specific matchup despite lower ranking.
Surface (Hard)▸ Andreeva●●
Andreeva: 71% on hard, 73% baseline (–2 pt edge). Kostyuk: 61% on hard, 68% baseline (–7 pt edge). Andreeva's hard-court game is 10 points stronger; warm, dry conditions (29°C, 47% humidity) amplify flat striking.
Serve/Return= Igualado
Serve: Kostyuk 62% vs Andreeva 61% (negligible). Return: both 46%. No tactical advantage; neither leverages a clear serving or returning edge.
Form= Igualado
Andreeva: 7/10 last 10, streak +2. Kostyuk: 7/10 last 10, streak +2. Identical recent form; no momentum separation.
Rest/Fatigue▸ Andreeva
Andreeva: 6 matches in 14 days, 1 day rest. Kostyuk: 4 matches in 14 days, 1 day rest. Andreeva's higher match load (50% more) may dull legs despite equal time since last match.
RANKING ECLIPSED BY ELO

Andreeva's #6 ranking nominally favors her, and the model assigns her 55% win probability—a modest edge. However, Elo ratings tell a different story: Kostyuk (1960) outranks Andreeva (1924) by 36 points, suggesting closer or reversed true strength. The model's 55% lean toward Andreeva rests heavily on ranking position, which may overstate her advantage in a live match where Kostyuk's recent Elo performance is more predictive.

KOSTYUK'S HEAD-TO-HEAD PROOF

In three recent meetings (all 2026), Kostyuk holds 2–1. Andreeva's solitary win does not reverse the pattern—Kostyuk has shown concrete ability to execute against her. This is not noise; it is match-specific evidence that contradicts the ranking gap and undercuts the favorite's numerical edge.

ANDREEVA'S HARD-COURT ADVANTAGE

Andreeva's hard-court record (71%, baseline 73%) towers over Kostyuk's (61%, baseline 68%), a 10-point performance gap. Warm, dry conditions (29°C, 47% humidity) favor big, flat strikers and reduce ball hang—Andreeva's structural strength on the surface. This is Andreeva's most concrete tactical advantage and explains much of her model edge; on slower surfaces, Kostyuk might be closer or favored.

FORM AND FATIGUE SPLIT

Both players show identical recent form (7–3 in the last ten, +2 streak). Andreeva, however, has played 6 matches in 14 days against Kostyuk's 4, a 50% higher load over the same window. Although both have 1 day of rest before Cincinnati, Andreeva's calendar congestion may blunt her hard-court edge slightly, particularly in a long match. Serve and return metrics are neutral (Kostyuk +1% on serve; return tied at 46%).

VALUE & PROBABILITY

The model assesses Andreeva at 55% and the market prices her at 1.82 (55% implied probability), yielding a negligible expected value of +0.4%. The market is essentially efficient. Andreeva is the slight favorite, but she is not a bargain: her Elo lags Kostyuk's, her head-to-head is 1–2, and her match load is heavier. Her only strong edge is hard-court form, which is real but not overwhelming against a player who also performs decently on the surface (61%). This is a coin-flip contest with a mild bias toward the favorite; backing Andreeva at 1.82 carries no statistical edge.

Impacto y análisis a partir de datos reales del partido (Elo, forma, cara a cara, descanso, superficie vs base, clima, altitud). El modelo ≈ el mercado de media; la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.

Analizar los partidos de hoy →