PREDICCIÓN DEL MODELO · 2026-08-14
HARD

N. Bartunkova vs A. Charaevapredicción

✓ Acertado
BARTUNKOVAPROBABILIDAD DE VICTORIACHARAEVA
66%
prob. modelo
@1.43
cuota · 70% impl.
H2H 0–1 BartunkovaDescanso 8d vs 3dHard 58%🎾Saque 59%📈Forma 6/10
CONDICIONES DEL PARTIDOen el modelocontexto
Superficie
Dura

Bote regular y velocidad media-alta: condiciones neutras, sin favorecer un estilo.

Temperatura
28°C

Ambiente cálido: la bola vuela algo más y el físico cuenta.

Humedad
77%

Aire muy húmedo: la bola se hace pesada y los puntos se alargan.

Viento
6 km/h

Viento flojo: sin efecto apreciable.

La superficie sí entra en el modelo (la especialización por superficie es uno de sus factores). El clima y la altitud son contexto que publicamos para ti — NO mueven la probabilidad.

EL RAZONAMIENTO DEL MODELO

Ranking: #39 vs #113 (mejor clasificado)

Forma reciente: 6/10 en los últimos partidos

Con ritmo de partido: 3 partidos en las últimas 2 semanas

Probabilidad calibrada del modelo (~64% de precisión fuera de muestra, validada específicamente en WTA). No es una garantía: el modelo ≈ el mercado de media, así que la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.
@1.51
cuota justa
−5.1%
valor esperado
CÓMO IMPORTA CADA FACTOR
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Bartunkova●●●
Bartunkova ranked #42 (Elo 1672) vs Charaeva #114 (Elo 1565). 107-point Elo gap and 72-ranking gap favor the selection; model assigns 63% to this advantage.
Head-to-head▸ Charaeva●●
Charaeva won their only meeting in 2026 (WTA). Single match, but direct evidence against Bartunkova's ranking advantage.
Form▸ Charaeva●●
Bartunkova 5/10 recent (last 10: WLWWLWLWWL, streak −1); Charaeva 6/10 recent (last 10: WWLWWLWWLW, streak +1). Charaeva momentum vs Bartunkova inconsistency.
Rest/Fatigue▸ Bartunkova●●●
Bartunkova 8 days rest, 3 matches in 14 days; Charaeva 3 days rest after reaching Cincinnati semifinal 3 days ago. Deep-run fatigue weighs against Charaeva.
Serve/Return▸ Bartunkova
Bartunkova serves 59% vs Charaeva 57% (marginal +2pp edge); Bartunkova returns 44% vs Charaeva 46% (−2pp deficit). Roughly neutral.
Surface▸ Bartunkova
Bartunkova 56% on hard (baseline 56%, +1 pt edge vs opponent average). No opponent surface data; edge minimal and unverified.
Weather= Igualado
29°C, 74% humidity, 8 km/h wind: warm and humid conditions favor longer rallies, neither player shows a clear tactical advantage.
RANKING EDGE WITH FORM DOUBT

Bartunkova's ranking advantage (#42 vs #114) and 107-point Elo gap form a solid foundation. The model weights this at 63% probability—a meaningful but not overwhelming edge. However, form data complicates the picture: Bartunkova has won only 5 of her last 10 matches and enters on a one-match losing streak, while Charaeva has won 6 of 10 with positive momentum (+1). The level gap should dominate over a 3–4 match stretch, but recent inconsistency from the selection narrows the practical advantage.

CHARAEVA'S PRIOR WIN AND FATIGUE TRADE

Charaeva's victory over Bartunkova in their only 2026 meeting is material evidence that ranking does not guarantee outcome. Yet that win must be weighed against Charaeva's immediate context: she reached the Cincinnati semifinal 3 days ago and has played only 1 match in the last 14 days, suggesting fresher preparation but also the accumulated neural and muscular fatigue of a deep run. Bartunkova, by contrast, has had 8 days to recover after 3 matches in 14 days—a significantly more favorable rest window. In best-of-three on hard court, deeper fatigue typically manifests in the tiebreak and third-set decision.

SERVE AND SURFACE: MARGINAL EDGES

On hard court, Bartunkova's serve (59%) edges Charaeva's (57%)—a 2-percentage-point gain that is real but modest and unlikely to determine the match. Bartunkova's return (44%) trails Charaeva's (46%) by the same margin, creating near-symmetry. Hard-court form numbers (56% for Bartunkova; no opponent data) show a 1-point surface edge, almost negligible. Conditions—29°C, 74% humidity, 8 km/h wind—are warm and humid, favoring longer baseline rallies over explosive serving, which slightly neutralizes Bartunkova's minor serve advantage.

VALUE AND MODEL-MARKET DIVERGENCE

The model prices Bartunkova at 63% (odds-fair ~1.59), but the market implies 73% (odds 1.37). The −13.7% expected value signals that backing Bartunkova at 1.37 is a losing long-term bet: you are paying 73% probability for a player the model estimates at 63%. Charaeva at 37% model probability is underpriced at 1.37, but the edge is modest and uncertainty remains high given her fatigue state and the single prior win's sample size. For match analysis: Bartunkova is the probable favorite, but odds overstate her advantage. Her recent form slump, Charaeva's momentum and prior win, and Charaeva's fatigue-recovery timing all inject genuine two-way risk into what the market has nearly priced as a banker.

Impacto y análisis a partir de datos reales del partido (Elo, forma, cara a cara, descanso, superficie vs base, clima, altitud). El modelo ≈ el mercado de media; la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.

Analizar los partidos de hoy →