PREDICCIÓN DEL MODELO · 2026-08-12
HARD

I. Swiatek vs E. Svitolinapredicción

Toronto
SWIATEKPROBABILIDAD DE VICTORIASVITOLINA
50%
prob. modelo
@1.45
cuota · 69% impl.
H2H 4–3 SwiatekDescanso 2d vs 1dHard 75%🎾Saque 60%📈Forma 7/10 · 4✓
CONDICIONES DEL PARTIDOen el modelocontexto
Superficie
Dura

Bote regular y velocidad media-alta: condiciones neutras, sin favorecer un estilo.

Temperatura
22°C

Templado: condiciones neutras.

Humedad
79%

Aire muy húmedo: la bola se hace pesada y los puntos se alargan.

Viento
10 km/h

Viento flojo: sin efecto apreciable.

La superficie sí entra en el modelo (la especialización por superficie es uno de sus factores). El clima y la altitud son contexto que publicamos para ti — NO mueven la probabilidad.

EL RAZONAMIENTO DEL MODELO

Ranking: #8 vs #9 (mejor clasificado)

Forma reciente: 6/10 en los últimos partidos

Cara a cara: 4-3 a favor

Sólido en pista dura: 78% en su carrera en esta superficie

Más descansado: 39d frente a los 11d del rival

Modelo 50% vs mercado 69% → el modelo lo ve menos probable que la cuota

OJO CON

!Vuelve tras un parón largo (39d) — posible falta de ritmo

Probabilidad calibrada del modelo (~64% de precisión fuera de muestra, validada específicamente en WTA). No es una garantía: el modelo ≈ el mercado de media, así que la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.
@1.99
cuota justa
−27.3%
valor esperado
CÓMO IMPORTA CADA FACTOR
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Swiatek●●
Swiatek ranked #8 vs Svitolina #9, Elo 1965 vs 1949 (+16). Marginal edge; Svitolina's -2 trend slightly better than Swiatek's -5 decline, narrowing advantage.
Form= Igualado●●
Both on 6-match winning streaks (WWWWWW endings). Swiatek 6/10 recent, Svitolina 6/10 recent. Quality wins favor Swiatek (M. Kostyuk ×2 vs none), but momentum equivalent.
Head-to-head▸ Swiatek●●
Swiatek leads 4–3 lifetime. Recent reversal: Svitolina won both 2026 meetings, Swiatek won both 2025. Trajectory favors opponent but historical record favors Swiatek.
Surface▸ Swiatek
Hard court: Swiatek 75% career, Svitolina 69%. Swiatek +6 percentage points, but serve-driven surface favors neither in this matchup (Swiatek 59% serve, Svitolina 55%).
Rest/Fatigue▸ Svitolina●●●
Swiatek 4 days rest, 6 matches in 14 days. Svitolina 3 days rest, 10 matches in 14 days. Svitolina far heavier load (67% match frequency vs 43%). Fatigue risk skews opponent.
Serve/Return▸ Swiatek●●
Swiatek 59% serve, 50% return vs Svitolina 55% serve, 50% return. Swiatek +4% on serve, return tied. Hard court rewards serve edge; Swiatek favored in serve-return economy.
Weather= Igualado
Mild 21°C, very humid (88%), 10 km/h wind. High humidity slows ball and lengthens rallies—neutral for both. Wind minimal; no clear advantage.
RANKING & ELO EDGE

Swiatek holds a narrow ranking advantage (#8 vs #9) with a 16-point Elo lead (1965–1949). Both players are in slight downward trends—Swiatek −5 in recent ranking movement, Svitolina −2—which suggests neither is building momentum at the elite level. The gap is material but not commanding; at this tier, 16 Elo points translates to roughly a 2–3% win-probability edge in isolation, consistent with the model's 51% baseline for Swiatek.

FORM & RECENT RECORD

Both players enter on identical 6-match winning streaks (WWWWWW to end their last 10 matches), with both showing 6-of-10 recent records. The critical difference lies in quality: Swiatek owns two wins over M. Kostyuk (Elo 1938), validating depth. Svitolina's win column is blank—no named quality victories. On a hard court where precision and consistency matter, Swiatek's documented wins over a strong opponent provide slight confidence, but the matching streaks mean form does not decisively favor either player in isolation.

REST & FATIGUE BURDEN

This is the match's sharpest divide. Swiatek has 4 days of rest after 6 matches in 14 days (43% match frequency), while Svitolina has only 3 days rest after 10 matches in the same window (71% frequency). Svitolina's workload is substantially heavier and, critically, more recent. Long rallies on a humid hard court will test both, but a player carrying 10 recent matches into a third consecutive day of play faces cumulative fatigue that Swiatek, better rested, is less likely to experience. Over a best-of-three format, this gap favors Swiatek measurably—fresher legs typically convert break chances and close sets more reliably.

SERVE, RETURN & HEAD-TO-HEAD

Swiatek serves at 59% vs Svitolina's 55%, a +4-point edge on a hard surface where the serve is paramount. Both return at 50%, so the service exchange tilts toward Swiatek. Head-to-head is mixed: Swiatek leads 4–3 lifetime, but Svitolina has won both 2026 encounters (vs Swiatek's two 2025 wins), suggesting recent momentum and familiarity in Svitolina's corner. The serve edge and lifetime record lean Swiatek; the recent h2h leans Svitolina. The matchup is finely balanced on the court.

VALUE ASSESSMENT

The market prices Swiatek at 71% implied probability (odds 1.4), but the WTA factor model—validated at ~64% out-of-sample accuracy—derives only 51%. This is a −28.9% expected value: the model does not support the favourite at these odds. The model's 51% is built on a marginal Elo edge, matched form, a recent h2h reversal favoring Svitolina, and a substantial rest advantage to Svitolina that the market may be underweighting. Swiatek is the better player on paper, but Svitolina comes in fresher and with momentum in head-to-head. At 1.4 odds, Swiatek is overpriced relative to her true win probability. A bettor backing Swiatek faces negative value.

Impacto y análisis a partir de datos reales del partido (Elo, forma, cara a cara, descanso, superficie vs base, clima, altitud). El modelo ≈ el mercado de media; la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.

Analizar los partidos de hoy →