CÓMO IMPORTA CADA FACTOR
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Jeanjean●●●
Jeanjean (#119, Elo 1619) ranks higher; Sakatsume (#135, Elo 1547) is 72 Elo points below and trending −10 in ranking vs +3.
Form▸ Jeanjean●●
Jeanjean 6/10 recent (streak −1), Sakatsume 4/10 (streak −2). Jeanjean's win rate and momentum edge outweigh Sakatsume's inconsistency.
Surface▸ Sakatsume●●
Hard court: Sakatsume 50%, Jeanjean 10%. Sakatsume's +40 percentage-point advantage on hard is substantial; Jeanjean lacks hard-court form.
Rest/Fatigue▸ Jeanjean●●
Sakatsume 10 days rest (4 matches/14d intensity); Jeanjean 8 days (2 matches/14d). Sakatsume returns after long layoff—risk of rustiness despite fresher tick.
Serve/Return▸ Jeanjean●●
Jeanjean serve 58% vs Sakatsume 54%; return 45% vs 43%. Jeanjean's serve edge (4 points) neutralizes Sakatsume's return, mitigating Sakatsume's overall offensive advantage.
Weather▸ Sakatsume●
Heat (30°C), humidity (60%), wind (14 km/h). Warm, humid conditions slow play and reward patience—neutral to slight edge for Sakatsume's hard-court baseline game.
RANKING & ELO MISMATCH
Jeanjean (#119, Elo 1619) is the better-ranked player and outranks Sakatsume (#135, Elo 1547) by a meaningful 72 Elo points—a gap typically worth 1–2 percentage points of win probability at this tier. Sakatsume is also trending downward (−10 ranking points in recent windows), while Jeanjean is climbing (+3). The model's 54% for Sakatsume is a contrarian call against the structural ranking advantage.
FORM: JEANJEAN'S CONSISTENCY
Jeanjean's last 10 is 6–4 with a −1 streak (one recent loss but steady overall); Sakatsume is 4–6 with a −2 streak, indicating recent stumbles and lower win rate. Neither has recorded a quality win in the provided data, so surface form and baseline consistency matter. Jeanjean's higher proportion of wins in the sample suggests better current match sharpness, giving her a psychological and momentum edge entering Cincinnati.
SURFACE & SERVE/RETURN DYNAMICS
Hard court is Sakatsume's domain: 50% win rate on hard vs Jeanjean's 10%—a 40-point swing that is Sakatsume's single biggest structural advantage. However, Jeanjean compensates with a superior serve (58% vs 54%) and comparable return (45% vs 43%). On a faster surface where Sakatsume thrives, Jeanjean's serve edge (4 percentage-point advantage) becomes critical; a strong server can hold serve more reliably and reduce break-point exposure, neutralizing some of Sakatsume's hard-court dominance. Sakatsume's return (43%) is mediocre, meaning she will struggle to capitalize on Jeanjean's service games.
REST & LAYOFF RISK
Sakatsume has had 10 days since her last match (fresher clock) and played 4 matches in 14 days before that—a moderate load. Jeanjean played 8 days ago and only 2 matches in the past 14 days, suggesting she has higher absolute rest. However, Sakatsume's 10-day gap, while nominally longer, follows a busier stretch; more importantly, a player returning from extended inactivity (implied by the 57-day reference in the risks note) faces rustiness risk that does not always vanish immediately. Jeanjean's steadier recent schedule and recent wins suggest she will be sharper at the opening.
MODEL VS. MARKET: NO CLEAR VALUE
The model favors Sakatsume at 54% against market-implied odds of 36% (EV +52.3% if the model is accurate). However, the model's confidence rests on Sakatsume's hard-court advantage and ranking recovery, both of which are partially offset by Jeanjean's superior ranking, form, serve, and overall consistency. The market is pricing in Jeanjean's structural advantages and giving Sakatsume a significant discount—likely because the market trusts ranking and recent form more heavily than a hard-court surface stat. Sakatsume is the tactical favorite on hard (her best surface) but the underdog in ranking and form. The 54% model estimate is plausible but depends entirely on the hard-court edge materializing in play; if Jeanjean's serve holds and the rallies are even, Jeanjean's higher ranking and better recent record may prove decisive. Betting Sakatsume at 2.81 requires conviction that hard-court form will overcome ranking and form headwinds—a reasonable bet on the data, but not an obvious steal.
Impacto y análisis a partir de datos reales del partido (Elo, forma, cara a cara, descanso, superficie vs base, clima, altitud). El modelo ≈ el mercado de media; la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.