You're viewing data from 8 Aug — today's update hasn't been published yet.
PREDICCIÓN DEL MODELO · 2026-08-08
HARD

I. Swiatek vs M. Kostyukpredicción

Toronto
✓ Acertado
SWIATEKPROBABILIDAD DE VICTORIAKOSTYUK
58%
prob. modelo
@1.70
cuota · 59% impl.
H2H 3–1 SwiatekHard 75%🎾Saque 61%📈Forma 7/10 · 2✓
CONDICIONES DEL PARTIDOen el modelocontexto
Superficie
Dura

Bote regular y velocidad media-alta: condiciones neutras, sin favorecer un estilo.

Temperatura
27°C

Ambiente cálido: la bola vuela algo más y el físico cuenta.

Humedad
74%

Aire húmedo: la bola pierde algo de velocidad.

Viento
19 km/h

Algo de viento: dificulta el control desde el fondo.

La superficie sí entra en el modelo (la especialización por superficie es uno de sus factores). El clima y la altitud son contexto que publicamos para ti — NO mueven la probabilidad.

EL RAZONAMIENTO DEL MODELO

Ranking: #3 vs #13 (mejor clasificado)

Forma reciente: 6/10 en los últimos partidos

Cara a cara: 3-1 a favor

Sólido en pista dura: 78% en su carrera en esta superficie

Más descansado: 35d frente a los 30d del rival

OJO CON

!Vuelve tras un parón largo (35d) — posible falta de ritmo

Probabilidad calibrada del modelo (~64% de precisión fuera de muestra, validada específicamente en WTA). No es una garantía: el modelo ≈ el mercado de media, así que la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.
@1.72
cuota justa
−1.0%
valor esperado
CÓMO IMPORTA CADA FACTOR
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Swiatek●●●
Swiatek #3 (Elo 1970) vs Kostyuk #13 (Elo 1966): ranking gap favors Swiatek, but Elo gap is 4 points—negligible. Model credits ranking edge.
Surface▸ Swiatek●●
Swiatek 75% on hard (baseline 76%), Kostyuk 61% (baseline 68%): Swiatek's edge is 14 percentage points. Hard suits her relative strength.
Serve/Return▸ Kostyuk●●
Kostyuk serves 65% vs Swiatek's 61%; Swiatek returns 49% vs Kostyuk's 47%. Kostyuk's serve advantage (4 points) and return weakness slightly favor opponent.
Head-to-head▸ Swiatek●●
Swiatek leads 3–1 overall, but Kostyuk won the most recent meeting (2026). Slight edge to Swiatek, but momentum fractured.
Form= Igualado
Both 6–4 in last 10 matches; both on 2-match winning streaks. Form is symmetric; no edge.
Rest/Fatigue▸ Swiatek
Both rested 2 days, both played 2 matches in 14 days. Swiatek flagged for 35-day layoff before tournament, possible rustiness; rest symmetry otherwise.
Weather= Igualado
Warm (29°C), humid (66%), windy (19 km/h): conditions suit hard-court baseline play; no systematic advantage to either player's style.
RANKING EDGE, ELO PARITY

Swiatek's #3 ranking vs Kostyuk's #13 is the headline level advantage. The Elo gap—1970 to 1966, just 4 points—tells a different story: at the true strength level, the two are nearly peers. The model's 58% probability for Swiatek is driven primarily by the ranking differential, which reflects Swiatek's career trajectory and consistency, but the narrow Elo gap suggests this is not a mismatch of talent. Kostyuk's +2 ranking trend (rising) also signals momentum in the opponent's favor, though from a lower baseline.

HARD COURT FAVOR

Swiatek's 75% hard-court record vs Kostyuk's 61% represents a 14-percentage-point surface edge—substantial. Relative to baseline (Swiatek 76%, Kostyuk 68%), Swiatek holds her ground better on hard, while Kostyuk dips further below her baseline. This is a real structural advantage: hard courts reward power, consistency, and flat striking, strengths associated with Swiatek's profile. The -7-point surface penalty for Kostyuk is the model's clearest anti-pick signal.

SERVE IMBALANCE COMPLICATES PICTURE

Kostyuk's serve (65%) outpaces Swiatek's (61%), a 4-point gap that will matter in a high-pressure match, especially on a hard court where serve velocity is magnified. Swiatek's return (49%) also trails Kostyuk's (47%), a smaller margin but still a deficit. This complicates the narrative: Swiatek has the ranking and surface edge, but Kostyuk possesses a more efficient first-strike weapon. On hard court, break points will be precious, and Kostyuk's serving prowess may compress the theoretical 14-point surface advantage into a narrower practical margin.

RECENT MEETINGS AND FORM SYMMETRY

Swiatek leads the head-to-head 3–1, but Kostyuk's victory in 2026 (the most recent clash) muddies confidence in that record. Both players are in identical form: 6 wins in their last 10 matches, both riding 2-match winning streaks. No recent momentum or fatigue edge exists; both are operating from a stable baseline. Swiatek's reported 35-day layoff before the tournament introduces a mild rustiness risk, though she has had time to shake it off before Toronto.

VALUE ASSESSMENT: ODDS DO NOT OFFER EDGE

The market prices Swiatek at 60% (1.67 odds), the model at 58%: a -2.8% expected value for backing the favorite. Swiatek is correctly priced or slightly overvalued relative to the model. Her ranking and hard-court record are real, but Kostyuk's serve efficiency, recent head-to-head form, and rising ranking trend are not trivial countervailing factors. The narrow Elo gap reinforces that this is a competitive, hard-to-separate match. Backing Swiatek at these odds does not offer a profitable edge; the favorite status reflects legitimate strength, but the market has already priced it in accurately.

Impacto y análisis a partir de datos reales del partido (Elo, forma, cara a cara, descanso, superficie vs base, clima, altitud). El modelo ≈ el mercado de media; la cuota ya captura casi toda la ventaja. +18 · juega con responsabilidad.

Analizar los partidos de hoy →